| physical environment community appearance
A sustainable and
attractive physical environment is essential to maintaining a high quality of life. Note
the following evaluations of the countys environment:
- A total of 56.6% of San Mateo County survey participants
consider the physical environment "excellent" or "very good" in terms
of being free of pollution, having clean streets and yards, and having attractive
neighborhoods and buildings, while 10.8% say the physical environment is "fair"
or "poor." Low-income individuals are most critical of their surroundings (29.5%
"fair/poor"). 367

While the physical environment in San
Mateo County received relatively high scores, survey participants did cite pollution and
environmental issues as a top health concern in the county. See Public Concerns page for
details.
land use
With much of San Mateo Countys land
either built out or protected, infill development has become a necessity although, there
is no agreement as to how much land is available for infill development. While many
believe that there is little land available, the San Mateo County Economic Development
Association reports that there is available land along the eastern transportation
corridors (Highway 101 and the CalTrain corridor).368
- The majority of urban development is located in the eastern
and northern regions of San Mateo County. Because of a lack of space, development is
moving towards the western region of the county. The dominant urban land uses are
residential, infrastructure, commercial, and urban open space. 369
- Between 1990 and 1995, over 1,000 acres of rural land and
urban open space gave way to residential, commercial, and industrial development. During
the same period, conservation groups in the county protected well over 1,000 acres of
forest and rangeland from development. Furthermore, park and conservation districts have
protected over 81,500 acres of open space in the county (28.7% of total county acreage). 370
- Total acreage for outdoor agriculture has stayed level,
while total acreage for indoor agriculture has grown. Indoor- and outdoor-grown floral and
nursery crops comprise the largest percentage of total gross production value. Organic
farming is slowly growing in the county. 371
- There is a large amount of land dedicated to recreation and
nature in the county. Of 15 responding cities, the number of acres of developed park lands
per 1,000 people ranged from .08 to 5.3 acres (Hillsborough had the least, Portola Valley
had the most). The number of acres of open space per 1,000 people ranged from .07 to 553
acres (South San Francisco had the least, Portola Valley had the most). 372
- All cities are adjacent to county park lands, state park
lands, dedicated open space areas, or watershed lands. 373
Community perceptions of outdoor
recreational options in San Mateo County are addressed on Reacreation,
entertainment & cultural offerings page.
air quality
- In San Mateo County, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide,
sulfur dioxide, and PM10 (particulate matter larger than 10 microns, i.e., dust, ash and
smoke) did not exceed the California standard between 1995 and 1996. The fact that
"days over standard" for PM10 was zero from 1995 to 1996 is especially good, in
that PM10 is a major air pollutant. 374
- Ozone levels in San Mateo County have fluctuated, exceeding
the standard on zero days in 1994, five days in 1995, and one in 1996. 375
- Although present and projected improvements illustrate a
steady rise in air quality, the countys cleaner air may be due more to prevailing
winds which carry pollution elsewhere than to a reduction in pollution. 376
Environmental health effects
attributed to dust or smog are addressed in environmental
health effects in this section.
water supply, quality & usage
- The countys water, mostly coming from the Hetch
Hetchy Reservoir in the Sierra Nevada, is very clean. The levels of all major contaminants
in the countys water are far below state standard maximum levels. Quality of
drinking water in San Mateo County has varied little over the last eight years and remains
excellent. 377
- San Mateo County survey respondents give the quality of the
local drinking water moderate evaluations, represented by 44.5% "excellent/very
good" responses and 22.6% "fair/poor" responses. These evaluations are
similar to those throughout California. 378
- San Mateo Countys water consumption per capita per
day is less than the Bay Area average. The 1995-96 level of per capita consumption was
128.3 gallons per day and represents a 5% increase in water consumption since 1993-94;
however San Mateo County consumption remains 28.2 gallons below the Bay Area average of
156.5 gallons per capita per day. 379

solid waste disposal
& recycling
Conservation, reuse, and renewable
resources are the tools for sustaining a healthy environment.
- In 1990, the average San Mateo County resident generated 8
pounds of solid waste a day, with 6.8 pounds disposed into landfills and 1.2 pounds
diverted (recycled or composted).380
- Although solid waste diversion is increasing, so is
disposal into landfills (up 9.5% from 801,361 tons in 1990 to 878,347 tons in 1996), at
least partially due to increased population. San Mateo County is far from achieving a 50
percent reduction in solid waste disposal by the year 2000 as mandated by the state. 381
- More than nine out of 10 San Mateo County survey
participants (93.2%) report that they participate in recycling efforts, either through a
community-sponsored program or on their own. This is slightly higher than that found
statewide (90.1%). 382

environmental
health effects
- Nearly three out of 10 survey respondents (28.4%) report a
household member with health problems such as breathing problems, asthma, allergies
or sinus problems related to environmental smog or dust. This is lower than
California overall (34.6%). 383

blood lead levels
- Significant concentrations of lead can be found in dust and
soil, and in paint, particularly in apartments and homes built before 1950. Overexposure
to lead may cause serious health problems in California workers, including injury to the
nervous system, reproductive system, kidneys, blood-forming system and digestive system.
Children aged 9 months to 5 years are at the greatest risk for lead poisoning. 384
- In addition, some home remedies commonly used among
resident ethnic communities also contain lead, including: 385
* Pay-loo-ah: a red powder given
for rash or fever. (Hmong community)
* Ghasard: a brown powder given as
an aid to digestion (Asian Indian community)
* Bala Goli: a round, flat, black
bean dissolved in "gripe water" and used for stomachache (Asian Indian
community)
* Kandu: a red powder used to treat
stomachache (Asian Indian community)
* Kohl (Alkohl): a powder used both
as a cosmetic eye make-up and applied to skin infections and the navel of a newborn child.
(Arab American community)
- Lead Exposure Risk Zones have been identified in selected
census tracts of Daly City, South San Francisco, San Bruno, Half Moon Bay, San Mateo,
Redwood City, Menlo Park, and East Palo Alto. 386
* Census tracts classified as high risk are those
that fall in the upper 50th percentiles of the proportion of families living under the
poverty line, proportion of population under six years of age, and proportion of housing
stock built prior to 1950. Several additional tracts were added due to the presence of an
unusually large number of childhood lead poisoning cases. 387
367 1998 San Mateo County
Quality of Life Survey. Healthy Community Collaborative of San Mateo County. September
1998.
368 Indicators for a Sustainable San Mateo County: A Report Card of
Our Countys Quality of Life. Sustainable San Mateo County. May 1998.
369 Ibid.
370 Ibid.
371 Ibid.
372 Ibid.
373 Ibid.
374 Indicators for a Sustainable San Mateo County: A Report
Card of Our Countys Quality of Life. Sustainable San Mateo County. May 1998.
375 Ibid.
376 Ibid.
377 Ibid.
378 1998 San Mateo County Quality of Life Survey. Healthy
Community Collaborative of San Mateo County. September 1998.
379 Indicators for a Sustainable San Mateo County: A Report Card of
Our Countys Quality of Life. Sustainable San Mateo County. May 1998.
380 Indicators for a Sustainable San Mateo County: A Report Card of
Our Countys Quality of Life. Sustainable San Mateo County. May 1998.
381 Ibid.
382 1998 San Mateo County Quality of Life Survey. Healthy
Community Collaborative of San Mateo County. September 1998.
383 1998 San Mateo County Quality of Life Survey. Healthy
Community Collaborative of San Mateo County. September 1998.
384 California Department of Health Services and the Childhood
Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch.
385 Ibid.
386 Healthy San Mateo 2000: Health Status Indicators. San Mateo
County Department of Public Health. Summer 1998 Edition.
387 Ibid. |